Yeah but their violence in Ukraine dilutes NATO military attention, even if they aren't that powerful a direct military ally.
jj4211
I suspect the concern is that no one, including China itself knows how strong they would be in a military conflict, since they haven't been in an at scale conflict in living memory, using economic power instead to great effect.
If they are really wanting to violently assert their view on Taiwan, they want global attention divided.
If they marketed on the actual capability, customer executives won't be as eager to open their wallet. Get them thinking they can reduce headcount and they'll fall over themselves. You tell them your staff will remain about the same but some facets of their job will be easier, and they are less likely to recognize the value.
Also codecs.. even with the right repositories enabled, you'll tend to install a media application that manages to be utterly incapable of actually processing most media.
They've made strides on this front but it's still messed up.
Also sometimes they are too aggressive on one front. Some of the applications you can install from their repository that have some python based features are broken because they can't handle python 3.13. There's some ability to install python 3.12 but without much beyond the core making it less useful.
I remember seeing that, and early on it seemed fairly reasonable then it started materializing pieces out of nowhere and convincing each other that they had already lost.
Because the business leaders are famously diligent about putting aside the marketing push and reading into the nuance of the research instead.
Why should that be bundled with peripherals.. doesn't seem to be a good "synergy".
That is your use case, that relative to your individual usage only one application uses the framework. In that very specific scenario, sure. However with electron it's forced to be that way for every single application no matter what your scenario is.
If electron packaged as a dependency, then it would be similar. But it's always forcibly bundled.
Questions would be:
Was this a sincere account or satire?
Even if sincere, did that post actually exist?
It just seems a bit too much to believe someone would admit it is just for the lulz at making liberals upset. Maybe they admit to it being a bonus but to say it is the point.. Particularly in a scenario where that admission very explicitly amounts to a self own...
Of the things listed in this post, I don't think Harris would have pursued any of those. There are other negative outcomes that may have been the same, but I don't think any of those.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
I mean, it's one banana. What could it cost? 10 dollars?