this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
281 points (98.0% liked)

World News

47699 readers
2504 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel's right to defend itself.

"Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon," declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to "remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 158 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Israel is the principal source of regional instability and terror and everyone and his dog knows this.

The kowtowing to Trump and his Zionist sponsors by the client states of the US Empire is an insult to objective reality.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Please don't make Iran out to be some sort of victim in all this. What Israel is doing is wrong, but Iran has funded a lot of terrorists throughout the years, and execute people in medival ways for holding hands with the "wrong" person.

The iranian government is pure fucking evil and deserves to die horrible deaths for what they instigate and fund around the world and in their local area.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a deep sarcasm that Western oil companies destabilized the Iranian monarchy, that * shockingly* wanted a piece of the pie in such a way it paved the way for islamist extremists to gain power.

Ian used to be pretty liberal and western minded, however westen meddling caused this extreme government.

But God forbid they get the means to (to use the Israeli turn off phrase) 'defend' itself, that would be horrendous.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, yes, we all know Iran used to be liberal a very long time ago.

That ship has sailed, and the current regime isn't great, to say the very least.

Nuclear bombs would not be used to defend Iran. They would be used to defend Khamenei. In the same way that nukes are for defending that shit stain in Israel and not Israel.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Ik no fan of the current regime, I think both Israel and Iran would benefit from a regime change. There's nothing more moral on the Israeli side to explain them deserving nukes over anyone in that region.

But the hypocrisy is that the Western world directly caused this shit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Ok, which country is actively committing genocide?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And not only that, Israel has nuclear weapons.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

...and it's supposed to be a secret because God forbid having to comply with international treaties on nukes. Well it's not like they respect international law anyway right? But the ones on nukes they just bypass and no one bats an eye

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 days ago (22 children)

nobody should have nuclear weapons.

Sometimes I wonder what the world would be like if the scientists working on the Manhattan project had all agreed it's too much and intentionally sabotage every test.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 days ago (21 children)

“We will do anything to maintain the status quo, up to and including genocidal ethnosupremacy”!

I am honestly so revolted.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

China, India, and Pakistan once again proving that having nukes does actually matter because you can't be arbitrarily shoved around around by the only other nuclear powers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

it also helps if your air defense network doesn't collapse immediately because it turns out that in order to guard these nukes you need also regular capable conventional military

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Ukraine had nukes and gave them up. They were invaded.

Iraq gave up their WMD program after the first Gulf War. They were invaded again.

Iran definitely had a nuclear program, but doesn't appear to be pursuing it anymore. They're getting attacked and quite possibly will get invaded.

South Africa had a nuclear program and gave it up. Left alone.

The Great Powers, particularly the United States but also Russia, have shown that your country should just keep going once you start. Chances are, you'll get invaded, anyway.

This is not the way towards anti-proliferation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Iran is two weeks away from nuclear capability" - Netanyahu: 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, 2025

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

He started a lot earlier than 2012

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,”

I guess we all just have to pretend Israel doesn't exist?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago

But genocide against Palestinians is a-OK.

What does the "G" in G7 stand for? Gaslighting? Genocide? Grift? Maybe there are 7 Gs.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

Why? If the West will allow Israel to live stream a genocide and both political parties in the US stick their fingers in their ears and make sounds like children, Iran has no choice but to pursue a nuke to defend itself.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

I would have worded this differently, but you're right in that it's probably a good idea not to give anyone an extra excuse.

"Oh but we had to" isn't a great excuse, but it is one, and if you take away the threat, it takes it away that argument.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (39 children)

Ukraine gave up their nukes, look what happened to them. Libya gave their nuclear weapons program up, and look at them today. North Korea didn't, and they're still standing, for better or for worse. Iraq was accused of having nukes, but didn't have them, and got destroyed. Seems that if you want any semblance of sovereignty outside of NATO, you better have some nukes.

So for any nations reading along I'll summarize the basic conclusions:

  1. Get nukes
  2. If you have nukes, do not give them up
  3. If you're accused of having nukes, drop everything and get nukes asap

Do you think Israel would be bombing Iran if they had nukes?

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Iran will have nukes. They don't have a choice. Not anymore. It's existentialism at this point. Israel has been trying to engineer a war against Iran for more than 30 years. All the while Iran has played along. IAEA inspectors and all that good shit. And it was all for nothing. Iran knows that now. So does everyone else.

If you're an adversary to the US and its Imperial interests then its a matter of when, not if. Doesn't matter if or how closely you follow their rules. They will come for you in time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They're out of time. US B52s and B2s will obliterate what's left of their nuclear facilities. F35s and drones will do the rest. For all the Zionist propaganda, there's absolutely no evidence Iran wanted to weaponise Uranium and every evidence that they wanted to cooperate with the West in return for sanctions relief, as they did in 2015 with the JCPOA.

The question is can Iran make it painful enough for the US by causing chaos in the straits of Hormuz and damaging oil and gas infrastructure that Trump loses interest and declares victory before he imposes regime change, which is what Netanyahu really wants.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

People with nuclear weapons have forbidden you from having nuclear weapons?

Humans are a goofy lot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Religious zealots can't be allowed to have nukes. You have to at least masquerade as a well-adjusted nation while you develop the nukes and slowly massage your zealots into positions of power over a few decades. Those are the rules.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nobody should have nukes, you fucking hypocrites..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

Probably best for all of us if nobody can ever have nuclear weapons, but what do i know..

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

Why not? The claims made by G7 members as to why are admissions - heck, one of the members has used nuclear weapons on civilians, and they’re still allowed to have them.

If anyone can, everyone can.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror.

Ok does someone want to catch me up on this opinion shared by world leaders but quite literally no one else?

Like yes, Iran is a terrible authoritarian state that is very dangerous. But so is Saudi Arabia?!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well you see the existence of Iran forces Israel to bomb them, thus destabilizing the region. If Iran would simply stop existing, Israel wouldn't have to bomb them, and the region would be stable

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

How else can the most advanced first-world nations keep exploiting the Middleeast?

With Netynyahu, we can change the government of any nation in the middleast. We just tell him to make a presentation that they're bad and have big weapons!

Guys please understand we, the US, UK, Germany, and rest of G7 first-world nations, reaally need to assassinate forign leaders and destory and kill the people of any nation that opposes the existance of a genocidal ethnostate aparthied .... because, the few Zionists who pay our salaries will not have a country where they can kill, evict, colonize, assassinate anyone who is not from their chosen race. Then we will have to give these brown people democracy, and their own governments?!!

If we did not make the middleast into dictatorships that work with our genocidal ethostate only, then they will not sell us cheap oil and will not have to couple all their trades, currencies and inflations against US dollar. Omg. imagine if they were then allowed to manufacture their own weapons and not buy trillions worth of military equipments and defense contracts from us? omg.. our 9999 military bases there? who will pay for them?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Well Pakistan will give them one if needed so they kind of already have one. Maybe stop pushing them to use it on Israel.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

NO ONE should have them. Dumb asses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Nukes for me but not for thee

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

“We will vaporize every living thing on the face of the earth in order to ensure that the threat of Iran possibly maybe but probably not having a nuclear weapon will be neutralized!”

load more comments
view more: next ›